<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Question of the Glass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paraquest.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/the-question-of-the-glass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paraquest.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/the-question-of-the-glass/</link>
	<description>Questions? Problems. Paradoxes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:57:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kaykays</title>
		<link>http://paraquest.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/the-question-of-the-glass/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>kaykays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paraquest.wordpress.com/?p=14#comment-11</guid>
		<description>My point is that the whole idea that it depends on your mood only matters in the sense of determining someone&#039;s mood or psychological way of thinking.  But in logical, practical terms, if you were to have an actual glass (not the metaphorical glass) in front of you, then it straight up depends.  If it was filled halfway, then it is technically, half full.  But, if it had been filled full and then half poured out or half drunk, then it is technically, half empty.  Two entirely different situations, to say it was half empty when it was only other half full, by my logic, would be an incorrect statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is that the whole idea that it depends on your mood only matters in the sense of determining someone&#8217;s mood or psychological way of thinking.  But in logical, practical terms, if you were to have an actual glass (not the metaphorical glass) in front of you, then it straight up depends.  If it was filled halfway, then it is technically, half full.  But, if it had been filled full and then half poured out or half drunk, then it is technically, half empty.  Two entirely different situations, to say it was half empty when it was only other half full, by my logic, would be an incorrect statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://paraquest.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/the-question-of-the-glass/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 02:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paraquest.wordpress.com/?p=14#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I think its both. How you look at is depends on what mood you are in at that moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its both. How you look at is depends on what mood you are in at that moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
